Editorial

Mission 

About 

News

Home

   
AigaForum
Reporter
National Electoral
Tigrai Net

Hmbashaa

EthioIndex

Gov't  own News
 Walta
 ENA
 Herald
Addis Zemen

 Radio Links

audio Deutsche Welle
audio VOA
audio Radio Fana
audio Tensae Radio
audio VOE Sweden
audio WUST AM 1120
audio Finote Radio
audio Sagalee Bilisummaa
audio Radio Selam Sw.
audio Dejen Radio         audioNetsanet 
ETV 
TV Selam Sweden

Eritrea
 Awate
 Asmarino
 Meskerem
 Kunama
 Shaebia

Ethio-Eritrea Conflict

 MediaEthiopia
 Tecolahagos
 UnitedEthiopia
 Ethiopian Review

BBC
IRIN
UN News
Sudan Tribune
Ethiopian HR Council
Amnesty
Human Rights Watch
Reporters without Borders

 

  

E.P.R.D.F ainít a "Raj"


The fourth President of the United States, James Madison, once wrote, "All governments rest on opinion." Mahatma Gandhi, the brain father of "Satyagraha" centered his political crucible in the premises that, the central role of consent in all government meant that non-cooperation--the withdrawal of consent--is something more than a morally satisfying activity where it is a seismic tool in the political world.

To that effect, in a bid to shake the very foundation of the British "Raj", he stated that, "I believe and everybody must grant that no Government can exist for a single moment without the cooperation of the people, willing or forced, and if people withdraw their cooperation in every detail, the Government will come to a stand still."

Ironically, Gandhi launched his non-violent ingenuity while he was a resident of South-Africa, however, with the contortion of historical events, South-Africans, in their perennial struggle against Apartheid resorted into violence to free themselves from the ramshackle of bigotry.

As it found its monumental place in the annals of history, and later on to be emulated by other social upheavals, Gandhiís "Satyagraha" was designed to function effectively and exclusively against a torque of an exotic "genetic pool" where the British "Raj" was a case study with in social activists, academics and historians alike. To utilize, Gandhiís "Satyagraha" in a different political dynamism and milieu as an elixir to a perceived political anomalies is not only a blunder of a historical proportion, it is also a show-case of political perfidy to oneís own integrity.

C.U.Dís kaleidoscopic mantra in an attempt to mobilize the Ethiopian people to stand against the incumbent government at times through un-Constitutional means and other times through ostracization of certain segment of the society is a glaring mishap and a despondence of political acumen in its part. Of course, power is not vested on governments, rather it is concentrated on the people.

As Gandhi brilliantly put it, should the people pull their trust from the rug of the government, the government becomes hanged in a standstill. Savvy governments recognize the imperatives of this reality and throw the crucible to render their political plat-form more inclusive designed to stand for the interest of the people. The entire people. And this is exactly the brains behind E.P.R.D.F is.

To perceive those who voted for E.P.R.D.F as non-Ethiopians and consequently to wage a social isolation to de-capacitate a certain ethnic group is not only a disservice to the noble cause of "Satyagraha", it is also a tragically misplaced political strategy which renders the leadership of C.U.D a laughing stock of the highest order.

The question that baffles many of sound synaptic clefts is that, why is it incredibly difficult to fathom the rules of engagements where the Constitution is the spinning wheel to throw a bait on. Why is it difficult for the leaders of C.U.D to challenge the incumbent government with in the structure of the system, in other means, with in the edifice of the Constitution? Those who are bright enough recognized the take of the day and opted to walk through the gates of the parliament and take their seats and bring their convictions in accordance with the spirit of the Constitution.

First of all, what the Opposition are re-missing time and time again is that, E.P.R.D.F is not a foreign power and adopting as a strategic tool a social isolation against those who adhere to the political plat-form of E.P.R.D.F or declaring a moot any State institution renders the leadership of C.U.D anarchists at best and bigots at worst.

The recent dramatic gesture by the leadership of C.U.D to nullify the institution of Court of Law is a non-issue strategy where it makes foreign observers in general and the democracies around the world in particular to augment a doubting eye on their take about the Opposition. Democracies have pledged an allegiance amongst themselves to have a lasting respect to the foundations of their respective Institutions.

This is the new wind of the emerging order from NEPAD in our continent to the other international political organizations. With in this premises, how do the leaders of the Opposition expect the leaders of democratic countries to have a "sympathy" toward them when they display a hubric contempt towards the Institution of the State?

The Ethiopian Constitution is designed in such a way that, not a single ethnic group can assume power. One does not have to have a super cerebrum to understand this card with in the shuffle. This article of the Constitution reflects the need for diversity in order to assume a political power and to share power with in the spirit of equity as well.

With in this modus operandi, how does the C.U.D possibly think that, it can assume power at the expense of other ethnic groups? If it is not an inclusive political party of other ethnic groups in a larger scale, how is this to be consistent with the zeitgeist of Ethiopia where the equal rights of every ethnic group is the pride of the new emerging Ethiopia?

To find a feasible answer to this otherwise daunting questions, the C.U.D if it is ever to survive as a political party, it needs to come out from its parochial box and assess its political threads not only to be taken serious but also to help the fledging democracy resume its vitality with an Opposition party whose very fabric is with in the tenets of the Constitution.

Paulos Yrgaw

Ottawa, Canada

comments:- asimov107@yahoo.ca

 

 

Notice: Blatant personal attacks are not permitted. Each contributor of an article must maintain a valid e-mail address. Comment on ideas, not people. Those that consistently ignore these guidelines will be blocked from posting further comments. Please do not use vulgar or profane language or language intended to defame. ethioobserver may remove or exclude offensive language to ensure a civil and professional atmosphere for all participants. We promote ethics by encouraging honest interaction. With your cooperation, we can keep this website clean.

 

Point of Interest

Response to Maekele

(Tigriniga)
Tsegai Berhe President of Tigray State
Interview with VOA'(Tigriniga)

___________________
AU Official: Ethiopian Vote Free & Fair, Opposition Complaints Exaggerated.
VOA

Joe De Capua

August 12, 2005
_________________

ክሕደት ወልፊ አይኮነን!! (Tigringa)

(Betrayal is not addiction)


Ethiopia's electoral investigation well conducted: EU.
Given the constraints in Ethiopia, the electoral board has done remarkable job in trying to bring the process to a satisfactory end, said Clarke.



ETHIOPIA: Prime Minister meets opposition leaders

ADDIS ABABA, 29 Jul 2005 (IRIN) - Ethiopia's political leaders have held their first ever face-to-face talks aimed at ending the deepening crisis over disputed legislative polls, an official said on Friday.



How we failed to lift Ethiopia's curse Sunday June 12, 2005

Who saved Birhan Woldu's life? July 7, 2005

 

PART ONE
A Sobering Lesson: The Menilik Factor and the New Defeatism "Alebabsew Biarsu Barem Yimelesu."

 

PART TWO
Emperors Tewodros II, Yohannes IV, Menilik II, and Myth of Colonialism

PART THREE
King Sahle Selassie, Emperor Menilik II, and the Betrayal of Ethiopia.

PART FOUR

Treaty of Peace With Italy (1947), Evaluation, and Conclusion 

 

In Response To Modernization A Poisoned Chalice For Ethiopians.

Zewge Fanta