Editorial

Mission 

About 

News

Home

 
Aiga Forum
Reporter
National Electoral
Tigrai Net

Hmbashaa

EthioIndex

Gov't  own 
 
Walta
 ENA
 Herald
Addis Zemen

 Radio Links

audio Deutsche Welle
audio VOA
audio Radio Fana
audio Tensae Radio
audio VOE Sweden
audio Finote Radio
audio Radio Selam   
ETV 
TV Selam Sweden

Eritrea
 Awate
 Asmarino
 Meskerem
 Kunama
 Shaebia

Ethio-Eritrea Conflict

 MediaEthiopia
 Tecolahagos
 UnitedEthiopia

BBC
IRIN
UN News
Sudan Tribune
Ethiopian HR Council
Amnesty
Human Rights Watch
Reporters without Borders
 

DISTORTING ETHIOPIAN HISTORY

By Mathza


History is supposed to inform current and future generations of events that took place in the past. It should be a factual recording. It should be a description of events exactly the way they happened. Historical statements made in articles and other writings should avoid omissions, i.e. hiding the bad sides of historical persons or group. They should not ignore or minimize the achievements of others. Omission is the subject matter of this writing.

I have personally observed a number of writings accusing Emperor Yohannes IV of helping the British expedition against Emperor Tewodros II. The latest which prompted me to react is one in Amharic “Le’adis Yetgl Tarik Enterarra (yidres leteqwamiwoch)” by Bekele Shumie in Ethiopian Review (6/20/07). I have written two articles related to such accusations and manipulations of history.* The following extensive quotation from Pat I of one of the articles shows that, on the contrary, it is Emperor Menelik II who deserves accusations not on one but on many counts.

“Emperor Menelik II, adored as “Immiye Menelik” by the diehards, has betrayed his country so many times by siding with all of its enemies and against Emperors Tewodros II and Yohannes IV. The following quotations from his own letters show how treasonous he has been.

·         To Napier leading the British expedition against Emperor Tewodros II: “I was first willing to send (supplies) to you in a suitable manner, but my enemies are between us… Now I am far off, but I have no hesitation (to help).”

·         To King Umberto of Italy after the Dogali defeat of the Italians by Ras Alula: “I can revenge the Italians who have died… I have confided to Antonelli many things that I cannot write which he should tell you.” After he was crowned Emperor he wrote to King Umberto “I would like the soldiers of your majesty to forcefully occupy Asmara and make sure that the route is well guarded and defended.”

·         To Caliph-Khedive of the Mahdists: “When you were at war with Yohannes, I was also at war with him. Between us there has been no war.” He avoided fighting the Mahdists twice: first together with King Tecle Haimanot, second with Yohannes IV.

·         Cooperation agreement related to Egyptians invasion: “The scheme was while the Egyptians Were attacking King Yohannes IV in the north, Muzinger Pasha and Menelik were to attack from the south.”

·         A similar cooperation arrangement was made between King Menelik and the Italians, the former to attack Yohannes IV from the south and the later from the north.

At the battle of Adwa he wanted, for the usual selfish motive, his 25,000 Shewan guards to come out intact. He had to be persuaded to release them participate in the final assault when the Italians had the upper hand and he was about to order retreat. If it were not for his wife, Empress Taitu, and Ras Mengesha there would not have been an Adwa victory. This and the above and other facts are taboo and do not appear in history books authored by Ethiopians.”

The above facts omitted in history books are glaring examples of how Ethiopian history has been and is being manipulated by chauvinists who dream the return to the old system of governance. Note that these same people are among those who practice politics of hate and follow the saying “the end justifies the means” in order to usurp power which they so much covet. Their lust for power has blinded them and they cannot, therefore, see the irreversible nature of the change that has taken place.

Repeatedly bashing Emperor Yohannes IV — a cheap attempt at scoring political gain — is not surely going to serve their own ends or help their cause. It is crystal clear from the above quotation that Emperor Menelik II is the root cause of the present predicament of Ethiopia in as far as all the troubles perpetrated by the Eritrean leader are concerned. Let us not forget that, with practically no contribution from his kings, Emperor Yohannes IV heroically and successfully defended Ethiopia from Egyptian, Mahdist and Italian aggressions in 1875, 1876, 1877, 1880, 1883, 1885 and 1887. It was Ras Alula who struck the first blow on Italian colonial aggression at Dogali in 1887 long before the battle of Adwa in 1896.

------------------------------------- 

*http://www.hmbasha.net/UrgentNeed4Reconciliation.htm

*http://www.ethioobserver.net/MANIPULATION.htm

Notice: Blatant personal attacks are not permitted. Each contributor of an article must maintain a valid e-mail address. Comment on ideas, not people. Those that consistently ignore these guidelines will be blocked from posting further comments. Please do not use vulgar or profane language or language intended to defame. ethioobserver may remove or exclude offensive language to ensure a civil and professional atmosphere for all participants. We promote ethics by encouraging honest interaction. With your cooperation, we can keep this website clean.