Addis time

  

button image   Africanidea
button image   America Gov
button image   Ayder
button image   Ethiopianame

button image   EUDF

button image   Eyasu Solomon 
button image   Mekelle city
button image   Meqelle
button image   Reporter
button image   TDVA
button image   Tecolahagos

button image   Tigrai Net
button image   Tigrai_online
button image   UTNA 
button image   Awate
button image   Ethio-Eritrea 
button image   Walta 
button image   Ethiopian Cult


button image     African Tribune

button image   AFP

button image   Amnesty I.

button image   Associate Press 

button image   BBC

button image   Boston Globe

button image   Chicago Tribune

button image   Christian Scien
button image   CNN
button image  
Daily Telegraph 

button image   Financial Times 

button image   Globe and Mail 

button image   Guardian 

button image   Independent 
button image  
International 

button image   IRIN

button image   Los Angeles 

button image   Miami Herald

button image   New York Times

button image   Reuters
button image   The Economist
button image   Toronto Star 
button image   USA Today
button image   Washington 
button image   Washington 
button image   Wall Street 

button image   Mawi speaks
button image   
button image  

 

Africom - Latest U.S. Bid to Recolonise the Continent 
by Tichaona Nhamoyebonde

political scientist based in Cape Town, South 
Global Research, January 10, 2010


African revolutionaries now have to sleep with one eye open because the 
United States of America is not stopping at anything in its bid to establish 
Africom, a highly-equipped US army that will be permanently resident in 
Africa to oversee the country's imperialist interests. 
Towards the end of last year, the US government intensified its efforts to 
bring a permanent army to settle in Africa, dubbed the African Command 
(Africom) as a latest tool for the subtle recolonisation of Africa. 
Just before end of last year, General William E. Garret, Commander US Army 
for Africa, met with defence attaches from all African embassies in 
Washington to lure them into selling the idea of an American army based in 
Africa to their governments. Latest reports from the White House this 
January indicate that 75 percent of the army's establishment work has been 
done through a military unit based in Stuttgart, Germany, and that what is 
left is to get an African country to host the army and get things moving. 
Liberia and Morocco have offered to host Africom while the Southern African 
Development Community (SADC) has closed out any possibility of any of its 
member states hosting the US army. 

Other individual countries have remained quiet. 

Liberia has longstanding ties with the US due to its slave history while 
errant Morocco, which is not a member of the African Union and does not hold 
elections, might want the US army to assist it to suppress any future 
democratic uprising. 

SADC's refusal is a small victory for the people of Africa in their struggle 
for total independence but the rest of the regional blocs in Africa are yet 
to come up with a common position. This is worrying. 

The US itself wanted a more strategic country than Morocco and Liberia since 
the army will be the epicentre of influencing, articulating and safeguarding 
US foreign and economic policies. The other danger is that Africom will open 
up Africa as a battleground between America and anti-US terrorist groups. 
Africom is a smokescreen behind which America wants to hide its means to 
secure Africa's oil and other natural resources, nothing more. 
African leaders must not forget that military might has been used by America 
and Europe again and again as the only effective way of accomplishing their 
agenda in ensuring that governments in each country are run by people who 
toe their line. 

By virtue of its being resident in Africa, Africom will ensure that America 
has its tentacles easily reaching every African country and influencing 
every event to the American advantage. 

By hosting the army, Africa will have sub-contracted its military 
independence to America and will have accepted the process that starts its 
recolonisation through an army that can subdue any attempts by Africa to 
show its own military prowess. 

The major question is: Who will remove Africom once it is established? By 
what means? 

By its origin Africom will be technically and financially superior to any 
African country's army and will dictate the pace for regime change in any 
country at will and also give depth, direction and impetus to the US natural 
resource exploitation scheme. 

There is no doubt that as soon as the army gets operational in Africa, all 
the gains of independence will be reversed. 

If the current leadership in Africa succumbs to the whims of the US and 
accept the operation of this army in Africa, they will go down in the annals 
of history as that generation of politicians who accepted the evil to 
prevail. 

Even William Shakespeare would turn and twist in his grave and say: "I told 
you guys that it takes good men to do nothing for evil to prevail." 
We must not forget that Africans, who are still smarting from 
colonialism-induced humiliation, subjugation, brutality and inferiority 
complex, do not need to be taken back to another form of colonialism, albeit 
subtle. 

Africom has been controversial on the continent ever since former US 
president George W. Bush first announced it in February 2007. 
African leaders must not forget that under the Barack Obama administration, 
US policy towards Africa and the rest of the developing world has not 
changed an inch. It remains militaristic and materialistic. 

Officials in both the Bush and Obama administrations argue that the major 
objective of Africom is to professionalise security forces in key countries 
across Africa. 

However, both administrations do not attempt to address the impact of the 
setting up of Africom on minority parties, governments and strong leaders 
considered errant or whether the US will not use Africom to promote friendly 
dictators. 

Training and weapons programmes and arms transfers from Ukraine to 
Equatorial Guinea, Chad, Ethiopia and the transitional government in 
Somalia, clearly indicate the use of military might to maintain influence in 
governments in Africa, remains a priority of US foreign policy. 

Ukraine's current leadership was put into power by the US under the Orange 
Revolution and is being given a free role to supply weaponry in African 
conflicts. 

African leaders must show solidarity and block every move by America to set 
up its bases in the motherland unless they want to see a new round of 
colonisation. 

Kwame Nkrumah, Robert Mugabe, Sam Nujoma, Nelson Mandela, Julius Nyerere, 
Hastings Kamuzu Banda, Kenneth Kaunda, Augustino Neto and Samora Machel, 
among others, will have fought liberation wars for nothing, if Africom is 
allowed a base in Africa. 

Thousands of Africans who died in colonial prisons and in war fronts during 
the liberation struggles, will have shed their blood for nothing if Africa 
is recolonised. 

Why should the current crop of African leaders accept systematic 
recolonisation when they have learnt a lot from colonialism, apartheid and 
racism? Why should the current crop of African leaders fail to stand measure 
for measure against the US administration and tell it straight in the face 
that Africa does not need a foreign army since the AU is working out its own 
army. 

African leaders do not need prophets from Mars to know that US's fascination 
with oil, the war on terrorism and the military will now be centred on 
Africa, after that escapade in Iraq. 

***********************************************
Tichaona Nhamoyebonde is a political scientist based in Cape Town, South 
Africa. 

                                                                                                              

Notice: Blatant personal attacks are not permitted. Each contributor of an article must maintain a valid e-mail address. Comment on ideas, not people. Those that consistently ignore these guidelines will be blocked from posting further comments. Please do not use vulgar or profane language or language intended to defame. ethioobserver may remove or exclude offensive language to ensure a civil and professional atmosphere for all participants. We promote ethics by encouraging honest interaction. With your cooperation, we can keep this website clean.